![3dlabprint spitfire retract 3dlabprint spitfire retract](https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171025/01ad6a88cf68cae66da7a7556a79ad62.jpg)
I did the work, I own the rights to the result of that work, unless somebody else pays for them.Your 1 Source for RC Models.
#3dlabprint spitfire retract free#
Just create a free account spill out any nonsense, nobody knows whoever you are, and there is no shame, no consequence, whatsoever.
![3dlabprint spitfire retract 3dlabprint spitfire retract](https://3dlabprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/spitfire_MkIX_pers_01-600x600.jpg)
I suspect this is just some typical Internet Troll. I expect idiots on the Internet, but even I do not expect such idiotic and incoherent arguments. Those copyrights to the design of F16 parts belong to Lockheed Martin. Remember, I only claim copyrights to the CAD files I created by measuring genuine F16 parts I obtained legally, but not the copyrights to the design of F16 parts. Once you realize that you do not, everything you said simply falls apart. Ultimately, your entire argument hinges on your belief that you own a copyright for your CAD files. Reverse engineering the 3D model using the physical product doesn't mean that your drawing is suddenly granted a different copyright from the one that Lockheed Martin already has. But you can't claim a copyright on the drawing, because you didn't design the product. It's not illegal to measure out dimensions for a physical product, or to even create a CAD drawing for it after all, you're just taking really precise measurements. You said that a Chinese seller has been tracing your 3D models and using them for commercial products and that this is violating your copyright.īut what you fail to see is that you've done the same thing you 'traced' a physical product designed by someone else, and think that because you drew the model 'from scratch' you didn't, you copied the physical productit entitles you to a cut of any profits made using it. It doesn't both you and Motorola would be infringing on Apple's design and copyright. This is no different than saying that if you bought an iPhone legally, then created a CAD file for it, then somehow you're granted a copyright to that CAD file and deserve a cut if Motorola uses it to manufacture their own iPhone clone. I mean, come on You claim that because you drew the CAD files based on the genuine parts, then that grants you a copyright to your CAD files, and that if anyone uses it to produce a commercial product, by law you deserve a cut. Just look at the quote in the following screenshot and you will get a glimpse of why I am angry and closing this project. I might delete them just because I rolled off the wrong side of the bed one day, or it takes up space for other things I want to do. But I make no promise for how long I will keep them up. This page will be kept, and the GitHub repository the links point to will also be kept, unless the new owner of GitHub Microsoft pisses me off.